Difficult Views: Unpacking President Joe Biden’s Controversial Tackle on Israel, Ukraine, and the Dynamics of Democracy.



(ThyBlackMan.com) “Hamas and Putin…each need to fully annihilate a neighboring democracy…Hamas’ said objective for present is the destruction of the state of Israel and the homicide of Jewish folks. Hamas doesn’t characterize the Palestinian folks. Hamas makes use of Palestinian civilians as human shields, and harmless Palestinian households are struggling tremendously due to them.” President Biden October 19, 2023

On October 19th President Biden gave an Oval Workplace deal with. He was desperately attempting to persuade the nation to help his $105B army and humanitarian help bundle for Israel, Ukraine and border efforts. His focus was on the wars between Israel/Hamas and Ukraine/Russia.

Challenging Perspectives: Unpacking President Joe Biden's Controversial Address on Israel, Ukraine, and the Dynamics of Democracy.

Biden’s presentation was ahistorical, based mostly upon supposition, private bias and simply flawed.  Certainly one of Biden’s fixed underlying themes as he champions help for these failing efforts is that by supporting Israel and Ukraine, we’re supporting “democracy”. One of many prevalent speaking factors about Israel is that it’s the “solely democracy within the Center East”.  First off, there are numerous democracies within the Center East, together with Turkey and Algeria. As for the settler colonial state often called Israel, it’s not a democracy. It’s outlined in its declaration of independence as a “Jewish state”. Thus, all approved political events should acknowledge Israel because the state of the “Jewish Individuals”, that means you can’t be elected to the Knesset (Parliament) should you name for a secular state for all its residents.  It seizes Palestinian land and destroys Palestinian properties, villages and cities with out judicial evaluate. If you’re Palestinian dwelling within the “Occupied Territories” , there isn’t a democracy.  In actual fact, democracy, freedom of self-determination and freedom from extra-judicial detainment and homicide are a serious a part of what Hamas is combating for.

Ukraine can also be not a democracy. The present battle was not “unprovoked” as President Biden loves to say.  The US overthrew the democratically elected authorities of Viktor Yanukovych within the Maidan Coup in 2014. The actions fomented by the US put an finish to democracy in Ukraine. As creator and columnist Branko Marcetic writes, “…understanding it’s essential to understanding the continued standoff over Ukraine…” Dr. Jeffrey Sachs writes, “There have been in reality two important U.S. provocations (to the battle in Ukraine). The primary was the U.S. intention to increase NATO to Ukraine and Georgia…The second was the U.S. function in putting in a Russophobic regime in Ukraine by the violent overthrow of Ukraine’s pro-Russian President, Viktor Yanukovych, in February 2014.”

If there may be democracy and sovereignty in Ukraine, why did the US dispatch former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson to Ukraine to finish peace negotiations? The Ukrainian information outlet Ukrayinska Pravda reported in Could of 2022, “Johnson introduced two easy messages to Kyiv. The primary is that Putin is a battle prison; he needs to be pressured, not negotiated with. And the second is that even when Ukraine is able to signal some agreements on ensures with Putin, they (the West) aren’t.”  Lastly, if there may be democracy in Ukraine, why did Zelensky ban 11 “pro-Russian” political events,  restrict the media’s entry to battle protection and cancel elections?  That is the “democracy” that President Biden needs to waist U.S. taxpayer {dollars} to defend?

On November 29th, Senate Majority Chief Chuck Schumer gave an impassioned 45-minute speech on the ground of the Senate throughout which he decried the rise of antisemitism within the US and Europe and pushed for help for the Biden administration’s Israel help bundle. Schumer mentioned, “Irrespective of the place we stand on the battle in Gaza, all of us should condemn antisemitism with full-throated readability wherever we see it…”  He additionally mentioned, “From October 7, 2023 in Southern Israel to 2018 on the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh to 1999 on the Los Angeles JCC…to 1492 in Spain, 1394 in France, 1290 in England … the Jewish folks have been humiliated, ostracized, expelled, enslaved, and massacred for millennia.”  The primary drawback along with his rhetoric in addition to Biden’s is the battle in Occupied Palestine didn’t start on October 7, 2023.

Schumer is right. All of us should condemn antisemitism. Nonetheless, that’s not what this 75-year battle is about. Schumer, Biden, Blinken, et al try to conflate or equate the Palestinian battle towards Zionism (a racist political ideology) with the historic struggles of Jews and Judaism (one of many three Abrahamic religions).  Blinken mentioned just lately in Israel, “When you’ll allow me a private apart, I come earlier than you not solely as the USA Secretary of State, but in addition as a Jew.” Biden is on file as saying, “I don’t imagine it’s important to be a Jew to be a Zionist, and I’m a Zionist.” The Palestinian battle is anti-Zionist, anti-oppression and anti-genocide.  It’s not antisemitic.  Opposite to the dominant rhetoric, the 2 aren’t the identical.

Simply as we should condemn antisemitism in all of its types, we should additionally condemn genocide, apartheid, the dehumanization of Palestinians and collective punishment.  That is what the settler-colonial authorities of Israel has been inflicting upon the Palestinians for seventy-five years with the assistance of the US. Israeli Protection Minister Yoav Gallant is on file as saying, “We’re combating towards animals, not folks…” Israel’s Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich is on file saying there was “no such factor as a Palestinian” as a result of “there isn’t a such factor because the Palestinian folks”. Palestinian individuals are “an invention” of the previous century.  This in in direct contradiction to the Balfour Declaration of 1917, “His Majesty’s Authorities view with favour the institution in Palestine of a nationwide residence for the Jewish folks, and can use their greatest endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be performed which can prejudice the civil and non secular rights of present non-Jewish communities in Palestine…” Take be aware, the “homeland” is in Palestine not Israel.

Throughout his speech within the Senate, Schumer particularly referred to as out the phrase ” from the river to the ocean,” saying it alarms Jewish folks to listen to it used.  This phrase just isn’t a name for extermination, it’s a name for freedom and equality amongst all inhabitants of the area.  When does the sensitivities of Jewish folks outweigh the genocide of Palestinians?  This differs from the primary Zionist claims of ‘a land with no folks for a folks with no land’ which ignores and/or denies the very existence of the folks which might be indigenous to the realm. This sounds eerily harking back to South African apartheid (and Israel was one of many largest supporters of South African apartheid) and the US genocide of Native People.




End story right here; Difficult Views: Unpacking President Joe Biden’s Controversial Tackle on Israel, Ukraine, and the Dynamics of Democracy.